Retrospective Tools

Lucidspark vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Lucidspark logo

Lucidspark

6.4

Lucid Software's whiteboard with the Lucid AI assistant, breakout boards and tight Lucidchart integration

Lucidspark is the whiteboard product from Lucid Software (makers of Lucidchart) — an infinite canvas with sticky notes, voting, timer, breakout boards, the Lucid AI conversational assistant (prompt-to-board, clustering, summaries), and bidirectional sync with Lucidchart for diagrams. Strong enterprise posture inherited from Lucid: SSO/SAML, SCIM, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701, FedRAMP, GDPR, and US/EU/AU data residency.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

3.9

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

Lucidspark scores 6.4 overall and is best for engineering and PM teams already on Lucidchart who want sticky-note retros and brainstorming on the same platform — and whose security review favours a SOC 2 / ISO 27001 vendor. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 3.9 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

Lucidspark leads on ease of use, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. Trune.io leads on retro toolkit and value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Lucidspark edges ahead with an overall score of 6.4. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Lucidspark
Ease of Use7.0
Retro Toolkit4.5
Value5.0
Fun Factor6.0
AI & Insights6.0
Integrations7.0
Enterprise-grade9.0
Trune.io
Ease of Use6.0
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value8.0
Fun Factor3.0
AI & Insights0.0
Integrations3.0
Enterprise-grade2.0
DetailLucidsparkTrune.io
CategoryWhiteboardRetrospectives
Team sizeMid-marketSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit3 editable boards, 100 shapes per board, basic templates, 1 AI sticky-note generation/day5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price$7.95/user/mo$19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$216/mo (Team plan, 24 users at $9/user)$57/mo
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded2010
HQSouth Jordan, USVienna, Austria
Data residencyUnited States · European Union · AustraliaGermany
Languages10 (English, Spanish, German, …)2 (English, German)
Features3617
Integrations79

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityLucidsparkTrune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimationsnote
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asananote
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluencenote
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linearnote
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slacknote
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioningnote
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks

Lucidspark — pros

  • + Tight integration with Lucidchart — switch between diagram and whiteboard on the same canvas
  • + Breakout Boards let you split a workshop or retro into parallel rooms
  • + Strong enterprise posture: SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001/27701, FedRAMP, GDPR, SSO/SAML, SCIM, US/EU/AU data residency
  • + Generous integration set: Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, Azure DevOps, Asana
  • + Free tier exists and is enough to evaluate the tool

Lucidspark — cons

  • No native anonymous voting — names always visible on stickies
  • No health checks, recurring retros, action carryover or cross-team rollup
  • AI is general brainstorming/clustering, not retro-aware — no sentiment, action-item extraction or trend insight across retros
  • Free tier is restrictive: 3 boards and 100 shapes/board limits real use beyond evaluation
  • Brand is best known for diagramming; retro template depth trails Miro and Mural

Trune.io — pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Integrations (Jira, Azure DevOps, Slack, Teams, Trello) run through Zapier, not native; integrations also require the higher Professional tier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons