Retrospective Tools

RetroTeam vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

4.7

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

6.1

Agile retros you'll love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, emoji reactions on notes, icebreaker games, background music and a clean facilitation flow. It pairs retros with a Pulse Survey module for tracking team health between sessions, aimed at small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

RetroTeam scores 4.7 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 6.1 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

RetroTeam leads on value and AI & insights. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, integrations, open platform and enterprise-grade.

Across our eight scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroTeam
Ease of Use8.5
Retro Toolkit5.0
Value9.0
Fun Factor4.0
AI & Insights6.5
Integrations2.5
Open Platform0.5
Enterprise-grade1.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use9.0
Retro Toolkit7.5
Value8.0
Fun Factor8.0
AI & Insights4.0
Integrations5.0
Open Platform3.0
Enterprise-grade4.0
DetailRetroTeamTeleRetro
CategoryRetrospectivesRetrospectives
Team sizeSmallSmall
Free tierYesYes
Free limit1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, 1 pulse survey, limited AI Retro Bot access
Starting price$10/mo£26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people$30/mo (Pro — 5 teams, 50 users; Premium's 2-team / 20-user cap doesn't fit 3 teams of 8)£72/mo (~$91/mo) on the Business plan (3 teams)
EnterpriseYesYes
Founded20222020
HQOakland, California, USUK
Data residencyUnited States
LanguagesEnglish only14 (English, German, Spanish, …)
Export formatsPDFEmail · Jira
Features2035
Integrations17

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

CapabilityRetroTeamTeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action trackingnote
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templatesnote
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async modenote
Agile Estimations
Health Checksnote
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOpsnote
Basecamp
ClickUp
Confluence
GitHubnote
GitLab
Jiranote
Linear
Microsoft Teamsnote
Monday.com
Notionnote
Shortcut
Slack
Trellonote
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPRnote
SSO / SAMLnote
SCIM provisioning
ISO 27001
On-premises
Public APInote
Webhooks
MCP server

RetroTeam — pros

  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow — capture, AI group, vote, act — with a timer on every stage
  • + AI grouping suggestions are accept/reject per card, not applied over your head
  • + Flat plan pricing: $30/mo covers 5 teams and 50 users, well under per-seat rivals
  • + Participants join by link with no account required
  • + Org-wide action dashboard with owner, status and due date, plus one-way Jira links

RetroTeam — cons

  • Jira is the only integration — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps, and no public API or webhooks
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Four built-in templates only; the custom builder fills the gap, but there's no template library
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2 or audit logs, and hosting is US-only with no EU residency option
  • AI is credit-metered — 50/mo on Premium, 150 on Pro, then an upgrade or a one-off credit top-up

TeleRetro — pros

  • + The deepest <strong>retro-native engagement set</strong> of any tool here — GIF and emoji reactions on notes, background music during brainstorming, an AI icebreaker bot, and 50+ themed formats with their own backgrounds
  • + Participants join by link with <em>no account required</em> — the fastest path from invite to first note
  • + Clean facilitation flow: brainstorming mode, drag-and-drop grouping, facilitator-gated voting with a configurable vote count, and mood polls at both ends of the session
  • + Pulse Surveys track team health between retros, with 20+ ready templates and a cross-team dashboard on the Business plan
  • + Genuinely cheap for a small org — £72/mo covers 3 teams with unlimited retros

TeleRetro — cons

  • Only Slack is documented as a native integration; Jira is claimed on the vendor's comparison pages but absent from its own integrations page, and everything else routes through Zapier
  • Actions carry owners but <em>no due dates</em>, and nothing links an action back to the idea that prompted it
  • AI never touches the board — Retro Bot generates formats and icebreakers, but there is no clustering, summary, sentiment or action extraction
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 of its own (the certs cited are AWS's), no SCIM, no audit logs, and SSO is Enterprise-plan only
  • No product update shipped since August 2025 — the marketing site is actively maintained, the changelog is not

Keep comparing

Not sure which to pick? Read our guide on how to choose a retrospective tool.