GoRetro
5.8Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun
GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a generous free tier and per-team paid plans.
Full review →
RetroFlow
3.7Your team's favourite way to retro
RetroFlow is a free, no-signup retrospective board built by solo developer Prashant Meena, with colourful boards, real-time collaboration, 7 ready-made templates, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items. Participants join a shared link in one click with no account; the whole product is free with no paid tiers or locked features.
Full review →Summary
GoRetro scores 5.8 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers paid plans from $29/team/mo.
RetroFlow scores 3.7 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a genuinely free, zero-friction retro board they can share with one link — no signup, no payment and no setup, accepting that there are no integrations, AI or enterprise controls. It offers a free tier.
GoRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. RetroFlow leads on value.
Across our seven scoring dimensions, GoRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 5.8. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | GoRetro | RetroFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Any | Small |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Free limit | 30-day free trial of all paid features, no credit card required | Everything is free — all 7 templates, real-time collaboration, anonymous feedback, dot voting and action items, with no account required to join a board |
| Starting price | $29/team/mo | Free |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $87/mo (Premium, 3 teams, billed annually) | Free (no paid tier) |
| Enterprise | Yes | No |
| Founded | 2020 | — |
| HQ | Israel | — |
| Data residency | — | — |
| Languages | English only | English only |
| Features | 35 | 7 |
| Integrations | 2 | 0 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | GoRetro | RetroFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓note | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | — |
| AI action items | — | — |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | ✓note | — |
| Polling | ✓ | — |
| Action dashboard | ✓ | — |
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓note |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓note |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓note | — |
| Agile Estimations | ✓note | — |
| Health Checks | ✓note | — |
| Team Kudos | — | — |
| Whiteboard | — | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Basecamp | — | — |
| ClickUp | — | — |
| Confluence | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| GitLab | — | — |
| Jira | ✓ | — |
| Linear | — | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | — |
| Monday.com | — | — |
| Notion | — | — |
| Shortcut | — | — |
| Slack | ✓note | — |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | ✓ | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | — |
| SSO / SAML | ✓note | — |
| SCIM provisioning | — | — |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | — |
| On-premises | — | — |
| Public API | — | — |
| Webhooks | — | — |
GoRetro — pros
- + Generous free tier with unlimited public boards and team members
- + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with strong template library
- + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
- + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
- + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier
GoRetro — cons
- − Slack integration sits behind paid tiers; SAML SSO requires Organization tier
- − Integration breadth is narrow: no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
- − AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
- − Async is just a multi-day feedback deadline, not a structured async flow; no whiteboard, no scheduling/recurring retros
- − Per-team pricing scales unevenly across many squads, and cross-team rollups are thin
RetroFlow — pros
- + Genuinely free with no paid tiers, no paywalled features and no account required to join a board
- + Anonymous feedback — participants contribute with no signup, email or PII collected
- + Three-step setup — pick a template, share the link, run the retro; participants join with one click
- + Seven ready-made retrospective formats covering the common reflection patterns
- + Real-time collaboration with live notes, dot voting and shared action items
- + Light personalisation — custom column names, 2-6 columns, 7 colour palettes and 48 emojis
RetroFlow — cons
- − No integrations at all — nothing pushes to Jira, Linear, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
- − No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction or sentiment)
- − No health checks, recurring retros, mood tracking or cross-team reporting
- − No enterprise security or compliance — no SOC 2, SSO, SCIM or audit logs; the privacy policy confirms only HTTPS and Vercel hosting with Google Analytics/PostHog analytics
- − Built and run by a solo developer (Prashant Meena) with no support team or SLA — fine for ad-hoc use, but unsuitable for enterprise procurement
- − Boards are private only by unguessable URL — there are no accounts, so no real access control, invite management or board history