Retrospective Tools

Kollabe vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Kollabe logo

Kollabe

7.5

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe is a focused agile-meetings platform bundling sprint retrospectives, daily standups, planning poker and 600+ icebreakers in a single lightweight workspace. Anonymous voting, async contributions, AI-generated summaries and sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps come standard, on a flat <strong>per-space</strong> rather than per-seat price.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

7.1

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and an AI-powered Pro tier covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker, backed by ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 alignment.

Full review →

Summary

Kollabe scores 7.5 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.

Reetro scores 7.1 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and fun factor. Reetro leads on integrations.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Kollabe edges ahead with an overall score of 7.5. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Kollabe
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.5
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 7.0
Integrations 6.5
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Reetro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 7.0
AI & Insights 7.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Detail Kollabe Reetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 10 members per room, ~4 meetings/month, 7-day history 3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price $29/mo $29/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $29/mo $29/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2023 2019
HQ Sydney, Australia Copenhagen, Denmark
Features 22 40
Integrations 4 6

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Kollabe Reetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Confluence note
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises note
Data residency (US/EU)

Kollabe — Pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
  • + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
  • + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants
  • + Direct sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps
  • + Public API and MCP server access on Premium

Kollabe — Cons

  • No Slack or Microsoft Teams integration
  • No SOC 2 / no advertised GDPR posture — weak for enterprise procurement
  • No dedicated health-check, team-radar or longitudinal pulse feature
  • Solo-founder operation; SSO/SAML and SLA gated behind Enterprise contact-sales
  • Free tier capped at ~4 meetings/month with 7-day history

Reetro — Pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required
  • + Per-team Pro pricing ($29/team/mo) keeps costs predictable for small squads
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified with SOC 2 alignment and audit logs

Reetro — Cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Voting is essentially upvote/downvote — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • Reporting & analytics screens (team reporting, comparative reporting, monthly reporting, PDF export) still listed as <em>coming soon</em>
  • Several quality-of-life features flagged 'coming soon' — link cards, @mentions, scheduler, icebreakers, on-premises, in-app notifications
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
← All comparisons