Retrospective Tools

Kollabe vs Miro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Kollabe logo

Kollabe

7.5

Agile meetings made easy — retros, standups and planning poker

Kollabe is a focused agile-meetings platform bundling sprint retrospectives, daily standups, planning poker and 600+ icebreakers in a single lightweight workspace. Anonymous voting, async contributions, AI-generated summaries and sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps come standard, on a flat <strong>per-space</strong> rather than per-seat price.

Full review →
Miro logo

Miro

8.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now repositioned as an AI-powered Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with 5,000+ retro templates, AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Sidekicks (AI teammates) and Flows (multi-step AI workflows), real-time + async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace including Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack and Microsoft Teams.

Full review →

Summary

Kollabe scores 7.5 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams that want retros, standups and planning poker in one clean tool — without per-seat pricing. It offers a free tier.

Miro scores 8.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

Kollabe leads on ease of use, retro toolkit and value. Miro leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Kollabe
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.5
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 7.0
Integrations 6.5
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Miro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail Kollabe Miro
Category Retrospectives Whiteboard
Team size Small Enterprise
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 10 members per room, ~4 meetings/month, 7-day history 3 editable boards, 10 AI credits/mo per team, 5,000+ templates, 160+ integrations
Starting price $29/mo $10/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $29/mo $240/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2023 2011
HQ Sydney, Australia Amsterdam, NL
Features 22 37
Integrations 4 8

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Kollabe Miro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana note
Azure DevOps note
Confluence
GitHub note
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

Kollabe — Pros

  • + Flat per-space pricing — unlimited team members on Premium ($29/mo)
  • + Bundles retros, standups, planning poker and icebreakers in one tool
  • + No-signup join links lower friction for ad-hoc participants
  • + Direct sync-back to Jira, GitHub, Linear and Azure DevOps
  • + Public API and MCP server access on Premium

Kollabe — Cons

  • No Slack or Microsoft Teams integration
  • No SOC 2 / no advertised GDPR posture — weak for enterprise procurement
  • No dedicated health-check, team-radar or longitudinal pulse feature
  • Solo-founder operation; SSO/SAML and SLA gated behind Enterprise contact-sales
  • Free tier capped at ~4 meetings/month with 7-day history

Miro — Pros

  • + Enormous template library (5,000+) and Miroverse community for retro formats
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by sentiment, tag, author and keyword; Sidekicks and Flows extend AI deeper into the canvas
  • + Best-in-class integration catalog (Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack, Teams) with two-way sync
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (AI governance) and EU/US/AU data residency
  • + Same canvas works for discovery, planning and retros — no context switching

Miro — Cons

  • Per-seat pricing scales painfully if retros are the primary use case
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync and SSO sit behind the $20/user/mo Business tier; SCIM and audit logs only on Enterprise (30-seat min)
  • No built-in retro report or action-tracker dashboard
← All comparisons