Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Sprintlio

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

6.9

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent timer, drawing-on-cards and hide-column updates through 2025-2026.

Full review →
Sprintlio logo

Sprintlio

4.1

Retrospectives with accountability via Slack and Jira

Sprintlio is a retrospective tool built around <strong>action follow-through</strong>, with Slack and Jira flows so action items don't die in a board after the meeting ends. Development appears to have largely stalled — the homepage still carries a 2023 copyright, there is no public changelog, and the last Product Hunt launch was February 2019.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 6.9 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Sprintlio scores 4.1 overall and is best for small agile teams that already live in Slack and Jira and want lightweight retros where action items get pushed back into the daily workflow. It offers paid plans from $50/user/mo.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 5.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 5.0
Sprintlio
Ease of Use 6.0
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 4.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 3.0
Detail EasyRetro Sprintlio
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 3 public boards/month, 1 survey per board, no team No free plan or trial publicly documented on the vendor site
Starting price $25/mo $50/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $25/mo $1200/mo
Enterprise Yes No
Founded 2016 2018
HQ Brazil Toronto, Canada
Features 25 12
Integrations 4 2

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability EasyRetro Sprintlio
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU)

EasyRetro — Pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — timer refresh, drawing on cards and hide-column shipped through 2025-2026

EasyRetro — Cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow — no Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is capped at 3 public boards per month and excludes private team boards

Sprintlio — Pros

  • + Action items sync to Jira and Slack — follow-through is the product's actual reason for being
  • + Slack-native flows: run recaps, reminders and notifications from the channel
  • + Simple, focused retro workflow without the all-in-one bloat

Sprintlio — Cons

  • Vendor site shows few signs of recent development — copyright still reads 2023 and the last public launch was 2019
  • Almost no AI, no health checks, no cross-team reporting — feature surface is thin by 2026 standards
  • No published pricing page, no documented SSO/SCIM/SOC 2 — enterprise readiness is unclear at best
  • Integration surface is narrow: Jira and Slack only, no Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
← All comparisons