Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Retro Rabbit

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

6.9

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent timer, drawing-on-cards and hide-column updates through 2025-2026.

Full review →
Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

5.6

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint with a /retro command, then runs the retro on a synced web board with voting, action items and an optional CarrotIQ AI assistant. <em>Public update cadence appears slow — verify the product is still actively maintained before committing.</em>

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 6.9 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Retro Rabbit scores 5.6 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/mo.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade. Retro Rabbit leads on AI & insights.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, EasyRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 5.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 5.0
Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail EasyRetro Retro Rabbit
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 3 public boards/month, 1 survey per board, no team 14-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $25/mo $30/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $25/mo $30/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2016
HQ Brazil United States
Features 25 17
Integrations 4 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability EasyRetro Retro Rabbit
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items note
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU)

EasyRetro — Pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — timer refresh, drawing on cards and hide-column shipped through 2025-2026

EasyRetro — Cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow — no Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is capped at 3 public boards per month and excludes private team boards

Retro Rabbit — Pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first workflow — capture notes via /retro during the sprint, not just at retro time
  • + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously, not in a 5-minute silent write
  • + Simple, opinionated UX with drag/drop grouping and dot voting
  • + CarrotIQ AI handles grouping, action items and summaries on the Pro AI plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing scales cleanly for small squads

Retro Rabbit — Cons

  • Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
  • No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, no documented GDPR posture
  • Per-team (not per-user) pricing can get expensive at scale across many small teams
← All comparisons