Retrospective Tools

EasyRetro vs Miro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

EasyRetro logo

EasyRetro

6.9

Improve your team with fun sprint retrospectives

EasyRetro (rebranded from FunRetro in November 2020) is a long-running indie retro tool with 100+ templates, drag-and-drop boards, an AI board summary feature added in early 2024, and recent timer, drawing-on-cards and hide-column updates through 2025-2026.

Full review →
Miro logo

Miro

8.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now repositioned as an AI-powered Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with 5,000+ retro templates, AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Sidekicks (AI teammates) and Flows (multi-step AI workflows), real-time + async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace including Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack and Microsoft Teams.

Full review →

Summary

EasyRetro scores 6.9 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams, scrum masters and consultants who want a clean, fast, low-friction retro tool without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

Miro scores 8.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

EasyRetro leads on ease of use and value. Miro leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

EasyRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.0
AI & Insights 5.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 5.0
Miro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail EasyRetro Miro
Category Retrospectives Whiteboard
Team size Small Enterprise
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 3 public boards/month, 1 survey per board, no team 3 editable boards, 10 AI credits/mo per team, 5,000+ templates, 160+ integrations
Starting price $25/mo $10/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $25/mo $240/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2016 2011
HQ Brazil Amsterdam, NL
Features 25 37
Integrations 4 8

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability EasyRetro Miro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling note note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana note
Azure DevOps note
Confluence
GitHub note
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

EasyRetro — Pros

  • + Extremely easy to use with minimal setup friction and a clean drag-and-drop board
  • + Library of 100+ retrospective templates spanning multiple categories and languages
  • + Free tier covers basic public boards for small teams or one-off retros
  • + Clean export options including Confluence, Jira (now bulk), PDF, CSV, PNG, Excel and DOCX
  • + Still actively maintained — timer refresh, drawing on cards and hide-column shipped through 2025-2026

EasyRetro — Cons

  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal trend reporting
  • AI is limited to a single board-summary feature — no auto-grouping, AI action items, sentiment, or template generation
  • Integration set is narrow — no Microsoft Teams, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • Vendor itself isn't SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certified (relies on GCP); SAML SSO is gated to enterprise accounts and there's no SCIM or audit logs
  • Free plan is capped at 3 public boards per month and excludes private team boards

Miro — Pros

  • + Enormous template library (5,000+) and Miroverse community for retro formats
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by sentiment, tag, author and keyword; Sidekicks and Flows extend AI deeper into the canvas
  • + Best-in-class integration catalog (Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack, Teams) with two-way sync
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (AI governance) and EU/US/AU data residency
  • + Same canvas works for discovery, planning and retros — no context switching

Miro — Cons

  • Per-seat pricing scales painfully if retros are the primary use case
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync and SSO sit behind the $20/user/mo Business tier; SCIM and audit logs only on Enterprise (30-seat min)
  • No built-in retro report or action-tracker dashboard
← All comparisons