Retrospective Tools

TeleRetro vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

7.0

Fun, engaging retrospectives your team will love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It targets small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

5.0

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

TeleRetro scores 7.0 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 5.0 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeleRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

TeleRetro
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 5.0
Trune.io
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail TeleRetro Trune.io
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, limited AI Bot access 5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price £26/mo $19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people £26/mo $19/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020
HQ UK Vienna, Austria
Features 33 18
Integrations 3 8

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability TeleRetro Trune.io
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence note
GitHub note
Jira
Linear note
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

TeleRetro — Pros

  • + Standout engagement features — animated GIF reactions and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
  • + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
  • + Async mode lets distributed teams contribute before the live session
  • + Action carry-over keeps previous items visible so nothing gets lost between sprints
  • + Generous free tier — unlimited retros for small teams with no credit card required

TeleRetro — Cons

  • No native health-check or longitudinal pulse module
  • AI limited to a beta board-summary feature — no grouping, action extraction or sentiment
  • Integration set is narrow — no Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No SCIM, audit logs or advanced enterprise controls; SSO gated to higher plans
  • No cross-team reporting or org-level dashboards

Trune.io — Pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — Cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Direct chat integrations (Slack, Teams) only via Zapier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons