Retrospective Tools

TeamRetro vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.3

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

5.0

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

TeamRetro scores 8.3 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

Trune.io scores 5.0 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

TeamRetro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 7.5
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 8.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Trune.io
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail TeamRetro Trune.io
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Enterprise Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial, no credit card required 5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price $25/mo $19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $25/mo $19/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2017
HQ Australia Vienna, Austria
Features 64 18
Integrations 9 8

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability TeamRetro Trune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence note
GitHub note
Jira
Linear note
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note note

TeamRetro — Pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Enterprise stack that's actually complete: SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — Cons

  • No free tier and per-team pricing scales quickly for large orgs
  • Cloud-only — no self-hosted or on-premise option
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)

Trune.io — Pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — Cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Direct chat integrations (Slack, Teams) only via Zapier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons