TeamRetro
8.3Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite
TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.
Full review →
TeleRetro
7.0Fun, engaging retrospectives your team will love
TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It targets small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.
Full review →Summary
TeamRetro scores 8.3 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.
TeleRetro scores 7.0 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.
TeamRetro leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, value and fun factor.
Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | TeamRetro | TeleRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Enterprise | Small |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Free limit | 30-day free trial, no credit card required | 1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, limited AI Bot access |
| Starting price | $25/mo | £26/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $25/mo | £26/mo |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| HQ | Australia | UK |
| Features | 64 | 33 |
| Integrations | 9 | 3 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | TeamRetro | TeleRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ | ✓ note |
| AI grouping/clustering | ✓ | — |
| AI action items | ✓ | — |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | ✓ | — |
| Polling | ✓ | — |
| Action dashboard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓ |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agile Estimations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Health Checks | ✓ | — |
| Team Kudos | ✓ | — |
| Whiteboard | ✓ | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | ✓ | — |
| Azure DevOps | ✓ | — |
| Confluence | ✓ | — |
| GitHub | ✓ | — |
| Jira | ✓ | ✓ |
| Linear | ✓ | — |
| Microsoft Teams | ✓ | ✓ |
| Slack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trello | ✓ | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | ✓ | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✓ |
| SSO/SAML/SCIM | ✓ | ✓ note |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ note | — |
| On-premises | — | — |
| Data residency (US/EU) | ✓ note | — |
TeamRetro — Pros
- + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
- + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
- + Enterprise stack that's actually complete: SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2, US/EU data residency
- + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
- + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence
TeamRetro — Cons
- − No free tier and per-team pricing scales quickly for large orgs
- − Cloud-only — no self-hosted or on-premise option
- − ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
- − Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
TeleRetro — Pros
- + Standout engagement features — animated GIF reactions and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
- + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
- + Async mode lets distributed teams contribute before the live session
- + Action carry-over keeps previous items visible so nothing gets lost between sprints
- + Generous free tier — unlimited retros for small teams with no credit card required
TeleRetro — Cons
- − No native health-check or longitudinal pulse module
- − AI limited to a beta board-summary feature — no grouping, action extraction or sentiment
- − Integration set is narrow — no Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
- − No SCIM, audit logs or advanced enterprise controls; SSO gated to higher plans
- − No cross-team reporting or org-level dashboards