Retrospective Tools

Sprintlio vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Sprintlio logo

Sprintlio

4.1

Retrospectives with accountability via Slack and Jira

Sprintlio is a retrospective tool built around <strong>action follow-through</strong>, with Slack and Jira flows so action items don't die in a board after the meeting ends. Development appears to have largely stalled — the homepage still carries a 2023 copyright, there is no public changelog, and the last Product Hunt launch was February 2019.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

5.0

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

Sprintlio scores 4.1 overall and is best for small agile teams that already live in Slack and Jira and want lightweight retros where action items get pushed back into the daily workflow. It offers paid plans from $50/user/mo.

Trune.io scores 5.0 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

Sprintlio leads on integrations. Trune.io leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Trune.io edges ahead with an overall score of 5.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Sprintlio
Ease of Use 6.0
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 4.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 3.0
Trune.io
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail Sprintlio Trune.io
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit No free plan or trial publicly documented on the vendor site 5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price $50/user/mo $19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $1200/mo $19/mo
Enterprise No Yes
Founded 2018
HQ Toronto, Canada Vienna, Austria
Features 12 18
Integrations 2 8

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Sprintlio Trune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence note
GitHub note
Jira
Linear note
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

Sprintlio — Pros

  • + Action items sync to Jira and Slack — follow-through is the product's actual reason for being
  • + Slack-native flows: run recaps, reminders and notifications from the channel
  • + Simple, focused retro workflow without the all-in-one bloat

Sprintlio — Cons

  • Vendor site shows few signs of recent development — copyright still reads 2023 and the last public launch was 2019
  • Almost no AI, no health checks, no cross-team reporting — feature surface is thin by 2026 standards
  • No published pricing page, no documented SSO/SCIM/SOC 2 — enterprise readiness is unclear at best
  • Integration surface is narrow: Jira and Slack only, no Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence

Trune.io — Pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — Cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Direct chat integrations (Slack, Teams) only via Zapier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons