Retrospective Tools

ScatterSpoke vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

7.1

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke is an AI-powered feedback platform that turns retrospectives, standups and team feedback into themes, sentiment metrics and prioritised action items for engineering leaders.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

5.0

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

ScatterSpoke scores 7.1 overall and is best for engineering orgs in Jira/Slack that want AI to surface themes and impact across many retros. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 5.0 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. Trune.io leads on value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 6.5
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 7.5
Trune.io
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail ScatterSpoke Trune.io
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 1 team, 10 users, unlimited retros, 20 AI reports/month, 90-day history 5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price $50/mo $19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $50/mo $19/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2014
HQ USA Vienna, Austria
Features 29 18
Integrations 3 8

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability ScatterSpoke Trune.io
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence note
GitHub note
Jira
Linear note
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

ScatterSpoke — Pros

  • + AI themes, sentiment scoring and impact analysis across retros
  • + 20+ retro formats plus custom formats with real-time collaboration
  • + Cross-team goals, metrics and executive-style rollups
  • + Action items sync to Jira; standups and async feedback included

ScatterSpoke — Cons

  • Integration coverage is narrow (Jira, Slack, Teams only)
  • No native health checks, team radars or mood tracking
  • Tier-based pricing jumps sharply ($0 to $50 to $500/mo)
  • SAML and SCIM gated to Business/Enterprise tiers

Trune.io — Pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — Cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Direct chat integrations (Slack, Teams) only via Zapier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons