Retrospective Tools

ScatterSpoke vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

7.1

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke is an AI-powered feedback platform that turns retrospectives, standups and team feedback into themes, sentiment metrics and prioritised action items for engineering leaders.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

7.0

Fun, engaging retrospectives your team will love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It targets small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

ScatterSpoke scores 7.1 overall and is best for engineering orgs in Jira/Slack that want AI to surface themes and impact across many retros. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 7.0 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke leads on AI & insights and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, value and fun factor.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 6.5
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 7.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 5.0
Detail ScatterSpoke TeleRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 1 team, 10 users, unlimited retros, 20 AI reports/month, 90-day history 1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, limited AI Bot access
Starting price $50/mo £26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $50/mo £26/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2014 2020
HQ USA UK
Features 29 33
Integrations 3 3

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability ScatterSpoke TeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU)

ScatterSpoke — Pros

  • + AI themes, sentiment scoring and impact analysis across retros
  • + 20+ retro formats plus custom formats with real-time collaboration
  • + Cross-team goals, metrics and executive-style rollups
  • + Action items sync to Jira; standups and async feedback included

ScatterSpoke — Cons

  • Integration coverage is narrow (Jira, Slack, Teams only)
  • No native health checks, team radars or mood tracking
  • Tier-based pricing jumps sharply ($0 to $50 to $500/mo)
  • SAML and SCIM gated to Business/Enterprise tiers

TeleRetro — Pros

  • + Standout engagement features — animated GIF reactions and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
  • + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
  • + Async mode lets distributed teams contribute before the live session
  • + Action carry-over keeps previous items visible so nothing gets lost between sprints
  • + Generous free tier — unlimited retros for small teams with no credit card required

TeleRetro — Cons

  • No native health-check or longitudinal pulse module
  • AI limited to a beta board-summary feature — no grouping, action extraction or sentiment
  • Integration set is narrow — no Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No SCIM, audit logs or advanced enterprise controls; SSO gated to higher plans
  • No cross-team reporting or org-level dashboards
← All comparisons