Retrospective Tools

ScatterSpoke vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

ScatterSpoke logo

ScatterSpoke

7.1

AI copilot for team feedback

ScatterSpoke is an AI-powered feedback platform that turns retrospectives, standups and team feedback into themes, sentiment metrics and prioritised action items for engineering leaders.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

4.8

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free <strong>Atlassian Forge</strong> app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into a collaborative retro board with templates, anonymous voting, action items that carry over between retros, GIF reactions, kudos, polls, and icebreakers.

Full review →

Summary

ScatterSpoke scores 7.1 overall and is best for engineering orgs in Jira/Slack that want AI to surface themes and impact across many retros. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 4.8 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

ScatterSpoke leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. SprintRetro leads on value.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, ScatterSpoke edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

ScatterSpoke
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 6.5
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 7.5
SprintRetro
Ease of Use 7.5
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 8.5
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 2.5
Detail ScatterSpoke SprintRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 1 team, 10 users, unlimited retros, 20 AI reports/month, 90-day history Free for unlimited users on a Jira instance
Starting price $50/mo Free
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $50/mo Custom
Enterprise Yes No
Founded 2014
HQ USA Waterlooville, United Kingdom
Features 29 14
Integrations 3 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability ScatterSpoke SprintRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU)

ScatterSpoke — Pros

  • + AI themes, sentiment scoring and impact analysis across retros
  • + 20+ retro formats plus custom formats with real-time collaboration
  • + Cross-team goals, metrics and executive-style rollups
  • + Action items sync to Jira; standups and async feedback included

ScatterSpoke — Cons

  • Integration coverage is narrow (Jira, Slack, Teams only)
  • No native health checks, team radars or mood tracking
  • Tier-based pricing jumps sharply ($0 to $50 to $500/mo)
  • SAML and SCIM gated to Business/Enterprise tiers

SprintRetro — Pros

  • + Genuinely free with unlimited users on your Jira instance
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into the retro context
  • + Built on Atlassian Forge — runs entirely inside Jira Cloud, no external data egress
  • + Action items carry over automatically into the next retro for follow-up
  • + Covers the engagement basics: templates, voting, action items, GIFs, polls, kudos, icebreakers

SprintRetro — Cons

  • Jira Cloud only — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Confluence, or standalone web app
  • No AI features (no clustering, summaries, sentiment, or action extraction)
  • No timer, drag-and-drop grouping, async mode, presentation mode, or scheduling
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs, or cross-team reporting
  • Young product (launched Sept 2025) with a small install base — fine for one team, less proven at scale
← All comparisons