Retrospective Tools

RetroTeam vs SprintRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

6.6

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →
SprintRetro logo

SprintRetro

4.8

Free sprint retros, embedded in Jira

SprintRetro is a free <strong>Atlassian Forge</strong> app from Agile Pulse that runs sprint retrospectives directly inside Jira Cloud. It pulls live sprint metrics (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into a collaborative retro board with templates, anonymous voting, action items that carry over between retros, GIF reactions, kudos, polls, and icebreakers.

Full review →

Summary

RetroTeam scores 6.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

SprintRetro scores 4.8 overall and is best for scrum teams already living in Jira Cloud who want a no-cost, no-friction sprint retro tool with sprint metrics baked in. It offers a free tier.

RetroTeam leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, RetroTeam edges ahead with an overall score of 6.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

RetroTeam
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 6.5
Value 8.5
Fun Factor 6.5
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
SprintRetro
Ease of Use 7.5
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 8.5
Fun Factor 6.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 3.0
Enterprise-grade 2.5
Detail RetroTeam SprintRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits Free for unlimited users on a Jira instance
Starting price $10/mo Free
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $10/mo Custom
Enterprise Yes No
Founded 2022
HQ Waterlooville, United Kingdom
Features 16 14
Integrations 1 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability RetroTeam SprintRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU)

RetroTeam — Pros

  • + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
  • + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
  • + Direct Jira sync for action items
  • + Active product — weekly blog cadence through March 2026

RetroTeam — Cons

  • Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
  • AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
  • Only 4 built-in templates and no custom-template builder advertised

SprintRetro — Pros

  • + Genuinely free with unlimited users on your Jira instance
  • + Pulls <strong>real sprint metrics</strong> (velocity, predictability, scope change, carryover, cycle time) into the retro context
  • + Built on Atlassian Forge — runs entirely inside Jira Cloud, no external data egress
  • + Action items carry over automatically into the next retro for follow-up
  • + Covers the engagement basics: templates, voting, action items, GIFs, polls, kudos, icebreakers

SprintRetro — Cons

  • Jira Cloud only — no Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Confluence, or standalone web app
  • No AI features (no clustering, summaries, sentiment, or action extraction)
  • No timer, drag-and-drop grouping, async mode, presentation mode, or scheduling
  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs, or cross-team reporting
  • Young product (launched Sept 2025) with a small install base — fine for one team, less proven at scale
← All comparisons