Retrospective Tools

Retro Rabbit vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

5.6

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint with a /retro command, then runs the retro on a synced web board with voting, action items and an optional CarrotIQ AI assistant. <em>Public update cadence appears slow — verify the product is still actively maintained before committing.</em>

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.3

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Retro Rabbit scores 5.6 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.3 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

TeamRetro leads on retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 7.5
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 8.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail Retro Rabbit TeamRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Enterprise
Free tier No No
Free limit 14-day free trial, no credit card required 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $30/mo $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $30/mo $25/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2017
HQ United States Australia
Features 17 64
Integrations 1 9

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Retro Rabbit TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items note
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

Retro Rabbit — Pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first workflow — capture notes via /retro during the sprint, not just at retro time
  • + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously, not in a 5-minute silent write
  • + Simple, opinionated UX with drag/drop grouping and dot voting
  • + CarrotIQ AI handles grouping, action items and summaries on the Pro AI plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing scales cleanly for small squads

Retro Rabbit — Cons

  • Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
  • No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, no documented GDPR posture
  • Per-team (not per-user) pricing can get expensive at scale across many small teams

TeamRetro — Pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Enterprise stack that's actually complete: SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — Cons

  • No free tier and per-team pricing scales quickly for large orgs
  • Cloud-only — no self-hosted or on-premise option
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons