Retro Rabbit
5.6Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture
Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint with a /retro command, then runs the retro on a synced web board with voting, action items and an optional CarrotIQ AI assistant. <em>Public update cadence appears slow — verify the product is still actively maintained before committing.</em>
Full review →
Sprintlio
4.1Retrospectives with accountability via Slack and Jira
Sprintlio is a retrospective tool built around <strong>action follow-through</strong>, with Slack and Jira flows so action items don't die in a board after the meeting ends. Development appears to have largely stalled — the homepage still carries a 2023 copyright, there is no public changelog, and the last Product Hunt launch was February 2019.
Full review →Summary
Retro Rabbit scores 5.6 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/mo.
Sprintlio scores 4.1 overall and is best for small agile teams that already live in Slack and Jira and want lightweight retros where action items get pushed back into the daily workflow. It offers paid plans from $50/user/mo.
Retro Rabbit leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights and enterprise-grade. Sprintlio leads on integrations.
Across our seven scoring dimensions, Retro Rabbit edges ahead with an overall score of 5.6. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | Retro Rabbit | Sprintlio |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Small |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Free limit | 14-day free trial, no credit card required | No free plan or trial publicly documented on the vendor site |
| Starting price | $30/mo | $50/user/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $30/mo | $1200/mo |
| Enterprise | Yes | No |
| Founded | — | 2018 |
| HQ | United States | Toronto, Canada |
| Features | 17 | 12 |
| Integrations | 1 | 2 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Retro Rabbit | Sprintlio |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ note | — |
| AI grouping/clustering | ✓ note | — |
| AI action items | ✓ note | — |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | — | — |
| Polling | — | — |
| Action dashboard | — | ✓ |
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓ |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓ | — |
| Agile Estimations | — | — |
| Health Checks | — | ✓ note |
| Team Kudos | — | — |
| Whiteboard | — | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | — | — |
| Confluence | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| Jira | — | ✓ |
| Linear | — | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | — |
| Slack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trello | — | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | ✓ note | — |
| GDPR | — | — |
| SSO/SAML/SCIM | ✓ note | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | — |
| On-premises | — | — |
| Data residency (US/EU) | — | — |
Retro Rabbit — Pros
- + Genuine Slack-first workflow — capture notes via /retro during the sprint, not just at retro time
- + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously, not in a 5-minute silent write
- + Simple, opinionated UX with drag/drop grouping and dot voting
- + CarrotIQ AI handles grouping, action items and summaries on the Pro AI plan
- + Per-team flat pricing scales cleanly for small squads
Retro Rabbit — Cons
- − Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
- − No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
- − No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
- − Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, no documented GDPR posture
- − Per-team (not per-user) pricing can get expensive at scale across many small teams
Sprintlio — Pros
- + Action items sync to Jira and Slack — follow-through is the product's actual reason for being
- + Slack-native flows: run recaps, reminders and notifications from the channel
- + Simple, focused retro workflow without the all-in-one bloat
Sprintlio — Cons
- − Vendor site shows few signs of recent development — copyright still reads 2023 and the last public launch was 2019
- − Almost no AI, no health checks, no cross-team reporting — feature surface is thin by 2026 standards
- − No published pricing page, no documented SSO/SCIM/SOC 2 — enterprise readiness is unclear at best
- − Integration surface is narrow: Jira and Slack only, no Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence