Retrospective Tools

Retrium vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Retrium logo

Retrium

6.2

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.3

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Retrium scores 6.2 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.3 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

Retrium leads on ease of use. TeamRetro leads on retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Retrium
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 6.5
AI & Insights 2.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 7.5
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 7.5
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 8.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail Retrium TeamRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Enterprise Enterprise
Free tier No No
Free limit 30-day free trial (column techniques and Team Radar), no credit card required 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $39/mo $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $39/mo $25/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2014 2017
HQ Washington, D.C., USA Australia
Features 23 64
Integrations 2 9

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Retrium TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard note
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

Retrium — Pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar covers psychological safety and custom health checks
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — Cons

  • No free tier; 30-day trial only
  • Integrations are thin beyond Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or insights
  • No native Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence integration
  • Public shipping cadence has slowed — no 2025 changelog or product blog activity visible
  • Retro-only scope; no planning poker, kudos, icebreakers or whiteboard

TeamRetro — Pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Enterprise stack that's actually complete: SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — Cons

  • No free tier and per-team pricing scales quickly for large orgs
  • Cloud-only — no self-hosted or on-premise option
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons