Reetro
7.1Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives
Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and an AI-powered Pro tier covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker, backed by ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 alignment.
Full review →
RetroTeam
6.6AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams
RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.
Full review →Summary
Reetro scores 7.1 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export. It offers a free tier.
RetroTeam scores 6.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.
Reetro leads on retro toolkit, fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade. RetroTeam leads on ease of use, value and AI & insights.
Across our seven scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | Reetro | RetroTeam |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Small | Small |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | 3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month | 1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits |
| Starting price | $29/mo | $10/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $29/mo | $10/mo |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2019 | 2022 |
| HQ | Copenhagen, Denmark | — |
| Features | 40 | 16 |
| Integrations | 6 | 1 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Reetro | RetroTeam |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | ✓ |
| AI action items | — | ✓ |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | ✓ | ✓ |
| Polling | ✓ | ✓ note |
| Action dashboard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom templates | ✓ note | — |
| Anonymous input | ✓ note | ✓ |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓ | — |
| Agile Estimations | — | — |
| Health Checks | ✓ | — |
| Team Kudos | ✓ note | — |
| Whiteboard | — | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | — | — |
| Azure DevOps | ✓ note | — |
| Confluence | ✓ note | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| Jira | ✓ note | ✓ |
| Linear | — | — |
| Microsoft Teams | ✓ note | — |
| Slack | ✓ note | — |
| Trello | ✓ note | — |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | ✓ note | — |
| GDPR | ✓ | — |
| SSO/SAML/SCIM | ✓ note | — |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | — |
| On-premises | ✓ note | — |
| Data residency (US/EU) | — | — |
Reetro — Pros
- + Generous free tier with no credit card required
- + Per-team Pro pricing ($29/team/mo) keeps costs predictable for small squads
- + AI summaries, sentiment analysis and monthly reports included on paid
- + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
- + ISO 27001 certified with SOC 2 alignment and audit logs
Reetro — Cons
- − Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
- − Voting is essentially upvote/downvote — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
- − Reporting & analytics screens (team reporting, comparative reporting, monthly reporting, PDF export) still listed as <em>coming soon</em>
- − Several quality-of-life features flagged 'coming soon' — link cards, @mentions, scheduler, icebreakers, on-premises, in-app notifications
- − No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
- − No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
RetroTeam — Pros
- + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
- + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
- + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
- + Direct Jira sync for action items
- + Active product — weekly blog cadence through March 2026
RetroTeam — Cons
- − Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
- − No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
- − Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
- − AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
- − Only 4 built-in templates and no custom-template builder advertised