Retrospective Tools

Reetro vs Retro Rabbit

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Reetro logo

Reetro

7.1

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and an AI-powered Pro tier covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker, backed by ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 alignment.

Full review →
Retro Rabbit logo

Retro Rabbit

5.6

Slack-first retrospectives with async note capture

Retro Rabbit is a Slack-native retrospective tool that lets teams capture notes throughout the sprint with a /retro command, then runs the retro on a synced web board with voting, action items and an optional CarrotIQ AI assistant. <em>Public update cadence appears slow — verify the product is still actively maintained before committing.</em>

Full review →

Summary

Reetro scores 7.1 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export. It offers a free tier.

Retro Rabbit scores 5.6 overall and is best for slack-centric agile teams that want to capture retro notes continuously through the sprint and run lightweight live or async retros without leaving chat. It offers paid plans from $30/mo.

Reetro leads on retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Reetro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 7.0
AI & Insights 7.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Retro Rabbit
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail Reetro Retro Rabbit
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month 14-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $29/mo $30/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $29/mo $30/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2019
HQ Copenhagen, Denmark United States
Features 40 17
Integrations 6 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Reetro Retro Rabbit
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items note
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Confluence note
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises note
Data residency (US/EU)

Reetro — Pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required
  • + Per-team Pro pricing ($29/team/mo) keeps costs predictable for small squads
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified with SOC 2 alignment and audit logs

Reetro — Cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Voting is essentially upvote/downvote — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • Reporting & analytics screens (team reporting, comparative reporting, monthly reporting, PDF export) still listed as <em>coming soon</em>
  • Several quality-of-life features flagged 'coming soon' — link cards, @mentions, scheduler, icebreakers, on-premises, in-app notifications
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations

Retro Rabbit — Pros

  • + Genuine Slack-first workflow — capture notes via /retro during the sprint, not just at retro time
  • + Reduces recency bias by collecting feedback continuously, not in a 5-minute silent write
  • + Simple, opinionated UX with drag/drop grouping and dot voting
  • + CarrotIQ AI handles grouping, action items and summaries on the Pro AI plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing scales cleanly for small squads

Retro Rabbit — Cons

  • Slack is the only chat/issue-tracker integration — no Jira, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No health checks, team radars or longitudinal trend reporting
  • No org-level dashboards, cross-team rollups or action kanban
  • Enterprise controls are thin: SSO is Enterprise-tier only, no SCIM, no audit logs, no documented GDPR posture
  • Per-team (not per-user) pricing can get expensive at scale across many small teams
← All comparisons