Retrospective Tools

NimbleRetro vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

NimbleRetro logo

NimbleRetro

4.4

Time-boxed retros with 5-Why root cause analysis

NimbleRetro is the retrospective module inside NimbleWork's broader Nimble agile platform. It runs structured, time-bound retros through Ideate, Group, Vote, Discuss, and Feedback stages, with anonymous input, action item tracking, and a 5-Why root cause workflow. Mobile apps for iOS and Android complement the web product, and action items convert directly into Nimble workitems.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.3

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

NimbleRetro scores 4.4 overall and is best for small agile teams that want a no-frills retro with built-in root cause analysis and a mobile companion app, especially teams already using the wider NimbleWork (SwiftKanban / Nimble) suite. It offers paid plans from $7/user/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.3 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

TeamRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

NimbleRetro
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 5.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 2.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 7.5
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 8.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail NimbleRetro TeamRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Enterprise
Free tier No No
Free limit Free trial only; no permanent free tier publicly disclosed for the retro module 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $7/user/mo $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $168/mo $25/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2017
HQ Bengaluru, India Australia
Features 11 64
Integrations 2 9

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability NimbleRetro TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard note
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

NimbleRetro — Pros

  • + Structured 5-Why root cause workflow built into the retro flow
  • + Anonymous input and time-bound stages keep retros focused
  • + Native iOS and Android apps for mobile participation
  • + GDPR compliant; sits under NimbleWork's ISO 27001 / SOC umbrella at the platform level

NimbleRetro — Cons

  • Only four templates with limited customisation of stages
  • No SSO/SAML, SCIM, or SOC 2 Type 2 attestation specific to the retro product
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, sentiment) at the time of review
  • Thin direct-integration story for the agile stack — no documented Jira, GitHub, Linear, or Azure DevOps hooks for the retro module
  • Pricing not transparently published; demo-gated

TeamRetro — Pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Enterprise stack that's actually complete: SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — Cons

  • No free tier and per-team pricing scales quickly for large orgs
  • Cloud-only — no self-hosted or on-premise option
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons