Neatro
6.5Structured retros built around psychological safety
Neatro runs retrospectives through a guided four-step framework with anonymous brainstorming, ROTI feedback, and Team Radar health checks aimed at distributed agile teams.
Full review →
Reetro
7.1Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives
Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and an AI-powered Pro tier covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker, backed by ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 alignment.
Full review →Summary
Neatro scores 6.5 overall and is best for scrum Masters who want a guided, safety-first facilitation flow with built-in team health tracking. It offers a free tier.
Reetro scores 7.1 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export. It offers a free tier.
Neatro leads on ease of use and retro toolkit. Reetro leads on value, AI & insights and integrations.
Across our seven scoring dimensions, Reetro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.
Scores compared
| Detail | Neatro | Reetro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Retrospectives | Retrospectives |
| Team size | Mid-market | Small |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Free limit | Free forever for up to 10 members, unlimited retrospectives, 70+ templates, 30-day data history | 3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month |
| Starting price | $23/mo | $29/mo |
| Est. 3 teams × 8 people | $23/mo | $29/mo |
| Enterprise | Yes | Yes |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
| HQ | Quebec, Canada | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Features | 27 | 40 |
| Integrations | 4 | 6 |
Feature & integration comparison
Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.
| Capability | Neatro | Reetro |
|---|---|---|
| Features | ||
| AI Summaries | — | ✓ |
| AI grouping/clustering | — | — |
| AI action items | — | — |
| Action tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Insights | — | ✓ |
| Polling | — | ✓ |
| Action dashboard | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom templates | ✓ | ✓ note |
| Anonymous input | ✓ | ✓ note |
| Independent voting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Async mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Agile Estimations | — | — |
| Health Checks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Team Kudos | — | ✓ note |
| Whiteboard | — | — |
| Integrations | ||
| Asana | ✓ | — |
| Azure DevOps | ✓ | ✓ note |
| Confluence | — | ✓ note |
| GitHub | ✓ | — |
| Jira | ✓ | ✓ note |
| Linear | — | — |
| Microsoft Teams | — | ✓ note |
| Slack | — | ✓ note |
| Trello | — | ✓ note |
| Security & Privacy | ||
| SOC 2 | — | ✓ note |
| GDPR | — | ✓ |
| SSO/SAML/SCIM | ✓ note | ✓ note |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ |
| On-premises | — | ✓ note |
| Data residency (US/EU) | ✓ note | — |
Neatro — Pros
- + Guided four-step framework that reliably produces psychological safety
- + Team Radar is a proper recurring health check, not a repurposed template
- + Automatic ROTI survey on every retro closes the feedback loop
- + Action carryover and a Kanban tracker keep follow-through visible between sessions
- + Generous free tier (up to 10 members, 70+ templates) and active blog/facilitation content
Neatro — Cons
- − No native Slack or Microsoft Teams integration for notifications or reminders
- − No AI features at all — no clustering, summaries, sentiment, or action-item extraction
- − Per-team pricing model gets awkward as the org scales beyond a handful of squads
- − Not independently SOC 2, ISO 27001 or GDPR certified — relies on Azure's underlying certifications
- − No cross-team rollups, org-level dashboard, SCIM, or audit logs
Reetro — Pros
- + Generous free tier with no credit card required
- + Per-team Pro pricing ($29/team/mo) keeps costs predictable for small squads
- + AI summaries, sentiment analysis and monthly reports included on paid
- + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
- + ISO 27001 certified with SOC 2 alignment and audit logs
Reetro — Cons
- − Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
- − Voting is essentially upvote/downvote — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
- − Reporting & analytics screens (team reporting, comparative reporting, monthly reporting, PDF export) still listed as <em>coming soon</em>
- − Several quality-of-life features flagged 'coming soon' — link cards, @mentions, scheduler, icebreakers, on-premises, in-app notifications
- − No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
- − No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations