Retrospective Tools

Miro vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Miro logo

Miro

8.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now repositioned as an AI-powered Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with 5,000+ retro templates, AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Sidekicks (AI teammates) and Flows (multi-step AI workflows), real-time + async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace including Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack and Microsoft Teams.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

7.0

Fun, engaging retrospectives your team will love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It targets small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

Miro scores 8.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

TeleRetro scores 7.0 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

Miro leads on AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and fun factor.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Miro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 5.0
Detail Miro TeleRetro
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Enterprise Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit 3 editable boards, 10 AI credits/mo per team, 5,000+ templates, 160+ integrations 1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, limited AI Bot access
Starting price $10/user/mo £26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $240/mo £26/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2011 2020
HQ Amsterdam, NL UK
Features 37 33
Integrations 8 3

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Miro TeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana note
Azure DevOps note
Confluence
GitHub note
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

Miro — Pros

  • + Enormous template library (5,000+) and Miroverse community for retro formats
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by sentiment, tag, author and keyword; Sidekicks and Flows extend AI deeper into the canvas
  • + Best-in-class integration catalog (Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack, Teams) with two-way sync
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (AI governance) and EU/US/AU data residency
  • + Same canvas works for discovery, planning and retros — no context switching

Miro — Cons

  • Per-seat pricing scales painfully if retros are the primary use case
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync and SSO sit behind the $20/user/mo Business tier; SCIM and audit logs only on Enterprise (30-seat min)
  • No built-in retro report or action-tracker dashboard

TeleRetro — Pros

  • + Standout engagement features — animated GIF reactions and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
  • + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
  • + Async mode lets distributed teams contribute before the live session
  • + Action carry-over keeps previous items visible so nothing gets lost between sprints
  • + Generous free tier — unlimited retros for small teams with no credit card required

TeleRetro — Cons

  • No native health-check or longitudinal pulse module
  • AI limited to a beta board-summary feature — no grouping, action extraction or sentiment
  • Integration set is narrow — no Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No SCIM, audit logs or advanced enterprise controls; SSO gated to higher plans
  • No cross-team reporting or org-level dashboards
← All comparisons