Retrospective Tools

Miro vs Retrium

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Miro logo

Miro

8.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now repositioned as an AI-powered Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with 5,000+ retro templates, AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Sidekicks (AI teammates) and Flows (multi-step AI workflows), real-time + async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace including Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack and Microsoft Teams.

Full review →
Retrium logo

Retrium

6.2

Guided retrospectives and Team Radars for scrum and agile teams

Retrium is a long-running, retrospectives-only tool that emphasises guided five-phase facilitation, anonymous brainstorming, voting, a persistent action plan, and Team Radar health checks for distributed teams.

Full review →

Summary

Miro scores 8.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

Retrium scores 6.2 overall and is best for scrum masters and agile coaches who want a focused, retro-only tool with strong facilitation guardrails and a built-in Team Radar. It offers paid plans from $39/mo.

Miro leads on fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade. Retrium leads on ease of use and retro toolkit.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Miro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Retrium
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 6.5
AI & Insights 2.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 7.5
Detail Miro Retrium
Category Whiteboard Retrospectives
Team size Enterprise Enterprise
Free tier Yes No
Free limit 3 editable boards, 10 AI credits/mo per team, 5,000+ templates, 160+ integrations 30-day free trial (column techniques and Team Radar), no credit card required
Starting price $10/user/mo $39/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $240/mo $39/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2011 2014
HQ Amsterdam, NL Washington, D.C., USA
Features 37 23
Integrations 8 2

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Miro Retrium
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard note
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana note
Azure DevOps note
Confluence
GitHub note
Jira note note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack note
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

Miro — Pros

  • + Enormous template library (5,000+) and Miroverse community for retro formats
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by sentiment, tag, author and keyword; Sidekicks and Flows extend AI deeper into the canvas
  • + Best-in-class integration catalog (Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack, Teams) with two-way sync
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (AI governance) and EU/US/AU data residency
  • + Same canvas works for discovery, planning and retros — no context switching

Miro — Cons

  • Per-seat pricing scales painfully if retros are the primary use case
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync and SSO sit behind the $20/user/mo Business tier; SCIM and audit logs only on Enterprise (30-seat min)
  • No built-in retro report or action-tracker dashboard

Retrium — Pros

  • + Battle-tested five-phase guided facilitation flow
  • + Anonymous brainstorming and grouping by design
  • + Persistent team-room action plan that carries forward between retros
  • + Team Radar covers psychological safety and custom health checks
  • + Per-team-room pricing with unlimited users on every plan

Retrium — Cons

  • No free tier; 30-day trial only
  • Integrations are thin beyond Jira Cloud and a <em>still-beta</em> Slack app
  • <strong>No AI features at all</strong> — no summary, clustering, action-item extraction or insights
  • No native Microsoft Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence integration
  • Public shipping cadence has slowed — no 2025 changelog or product blog activity visible
  • Retro-only scope; no planning poker, kudos, icebreakers or whiteboard
← All comparisons