Retrospective Tools

Ludi vs TeamRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Ludi logo

Ludi

6.9

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
TeamRetro logo

TeamRetro

8.3

Retrospectives, health checks and agile estimations in one suite

TeamRetro pairs structured retrospectives with longitudinal team health checks and planning-poker estimations, aimed at agile organisations running multiple teams under a coach or programme.

Full review →

Summary

Ludi scores 6.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $5/user/mo.

TeamRetro scores 8.3 overall and is best for agile coaches and engineering managers running ongoing health-check programmes alongside sprint retros. It offers paid plans from $25/mo.

Ludi leads on ease of use and fun factor. TeamRetro leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, TeamRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Ludi
Ease of Use 9.5
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 9.5
AI & Insights 4.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 5.5
TeamRetro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 9.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 7.5
AI & Insights 8.5
Integrations 8.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail Ludi TeamRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Enterprise
Free tier No No
Free limit 30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires 30-day free trial, no credit card required
Starting price $5/user/mo $25/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $120/mo $25/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020 2017
HQ UK Australia
Features 33 64
Integrations 1 9

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Ludi TeamRetro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001 note
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note note

Ludi — Pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) on SOC 2 / ISO 27001 infrastructure; GDPR-aligned

Ludi — Cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to Enterprise tier; no SCIM, audit logs or domain restrictions advertised

TeamRetro — Pros

  • + Health checks with custom models, longitudinal tracking and cross-team reporting
  • + Three modules in one suite (retros, health checks, planning poker)
  • + Enterprise stack that's actually complete: SSO, SCIM, audit logs, SOC 2 Type 2, US/EU data residency
  • + AI grouping, template suggestions, action items and sentiment built in
  • + Broad agile-tool integrations including Jira, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence

TeamRetro — Cons

  • No free tier and per-team pricing scales quickly for large orgs
  • Cloud-only — no self-hosted or on-premise option
  • ISO 27001 is inherited via AWS, not held directly
  • Data residency limited to US and EU (no APAC region)
← All comparisons