Retrospective Tools

Ludi vs Sprintlio

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Ludi logo

Ludi

6.9

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
Sprintlio logo

Sprintlio

4.1

Retrospectives with accountability via Slack and Jira

Sprintlio is a retrospective tool built around <strong>action follow-through</strong>, with Slack and Jira flows so action items don't die in a board after the meeting ends. Development appears to have largely stalled — the homepage still carries a 2023 copyright, there is no public changelog, and the last Product Hunt launch was February 2019.

Full review →

Summary

Ludi scores 6.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $5/user/mo.

Sprintlio scores 4.1 overall and is best for small agile teams that already live in Slack and Jira and want lightweight retros where action items get pushed back into the daily workflow. It offers paid plans from $50/user/mo.

Ludi leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value, fun factor, AI & insights and enterprise-grade. Sprintlio leads on integrations.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Ludi edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Ludi
Ease of Use 9.5
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 9.5
AI & Insights 4.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 5.5
Sprintlio
Ease of Use 6.0
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 4.0
Fun Factor 4.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 3.0
Detail Ludi Sprintlio
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier No No
Free limit 30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires No free plan or trial publicly documented on the vendor site
Starting price $5/user/mo $50/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $120/mo $1200/mo
Enterprise Yes No
Founded 2020 2018
HQ UK Toronto, Canada
Features 33 12
Integrations 1 2

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Ludi Sprintlio
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

Ludi — Pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) on SOC 2 / ISO 27001 infrastructure; GDPR-aligned

Ludi — Cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to Enterprise tier; no SCIM, audit logs or domain restrictions advertised

Sprintlio — Pros

  • + Action items sync to Jira and Slack — follow-through is the product's actual reason for being
  • + Slack-native flows: run recaps, reminders and notifications from the channel
  • + Simple, focused retro workflow without the all-in-one bloat

Sprintlio — Cons

  • Vendor site shows few signs of recent development — copyright still reads 2023 and the last public launch was 2019
  • Almost no AI, no health checks, no cross-team reporting — feature surface is thin by 2026 standards
  • No published pricing page, no documented SSO/SCIM/SOC 2 — enterprise readiness is unclear at best
  • Integration surface is narrow: Jira and Slack only, no Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear or Confluence
← All comparisons