Retrospective Tools

Ludi vs Miro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Ludi logo

Ludi

6.9

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →
Miro logo

Miro

8.1

Innovation Workspace where retros happen on the same canvas as discovery and planning

Miro is the dominant online whiteboard, now repositioned as an AI-powered Innovation Workspace. It pairs an infinite canvas with 5,000+ retro templates, AI clustering by sentiment/keyword/author, Sidekicks (AI teammates) and Flows (multi-step AI workflows), real-time + async collaboration, and a 250+ app marketplace including Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack and Microsoft Teams.

Full review →

Summary

Ludi scores 6.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $5/user/mo.

Miro scores 8.1 overall and is best for large product, design and engineering orgs that already run discovery, planning and retros on one canvas and want AI clustering plus deep Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync. It offers a free tier.

Ludi leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, value and fun factor. Miro leads on AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Miro edges ahead with an overall score of 8.1. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Ludi
Ease of Use 9.5
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 9.5
AI & Insights 4.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 5.5
Miro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 6.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 9.5
Enterprise-grade 9.5
Detail Ludi Miro
Category Retrospectives Whiteboard
Team size Small Enterprise
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires 3 editable boards, 10 AI credits/mo per team, 5,000+ templates, 160+ integrations
Starting price $5/user/mo $10/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $120/mo $240/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020 2011
HQ UK Amsterdam, NL
Features 33 37
Integrations 1 8

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Ludi Miro
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking note
Team Insights
Polling note note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input note note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana note
Azure DevOps note
Confluence
GitHub note
Jira note note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note note

Ludi — Pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) on SOC 2 / ISO 27001 infrastructure; GDPR-aligned

Ludi — Cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to Enterprise tier; no SCIM, audit logs or domain restrictions advertised

Miro — Pros

  • + Enormous template library (5,000+) and Miroverse community for retro formats
  • + AI clustering groups sticky notes by sentiment, tag, author and keyword; Sidekicks and Flows extend AI deeper into the canvas
  • + Best-in-class integration catalog (Jira, Azure DevOps, Asana, Confluence, Slack, Teams) with two-way sync
  • + Enterprise-grade SSO, SCIM, audit logs, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (AI governance) and EU/US/AU data residency
  • + Same canvas works for discovery, planning and retros — no context switching

Miro — Cons

  • Per-seat pricing scales painfully if retros are the primary use case
  • No native health checks, mood tracking or longitudinal team-pulse
  • No recurring retros, scheduling, action carryover or cross-team rollup — facilitators rebuild structure each sprint
  • Jira/Azure DevOps/Asana sync and SSO sit behind the $20/user/mo Business tier; SCIM and audit logs only on Enterprise (30-seat min)
  • No built-in retro report or action-tracker dashboard
← All comparisons