Retrospective Tools

IdeaBoardz vs Ludi

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

IdeaBoardz logo

IdeaBoardz

3.6

Free shared brainstorming boards

IdeaBoardz is a long-standing free brainstorming and retrospective board where anyone can spin up a shared URL, add ideas in customisable sections, vote, and export to PDF or Excel. The site is still online and the app still works, but the product appears to be in maintenance mode at best — Terms were last updated in April 2020 and there is no blog, changelog or roadmap to suggest active development.

Full review →
Ludi logo

Ludi

6.9

Playful collaborative whiteboard for agile teams

Ludi (formerly Metro Retro, rebranded August 2025) is a visual agile collaboration whiteboard with 100+ templates spanning retros, planning poker, icebreakers and futurespectives. Its signature illustrated canvas and gadgets make ceremonies feel engaging, and a first AI feature — sticky-note clustering — shipped February 2026.

Full review →

Summary

IdeaBoardz scores 3.6 overall and is best for throwaway retros and quick distributed brainstorms when nobody wants to sign up. It offers a free tier.

Ludi scores 6.9 overall and is best for agile teams who want retros, planning and workshops to feel visual and fun, with a solid Jira-backed delivery loop. It offers paid plans from $5/user/mo.

IdeaBoardz leads on value. Ludi leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Ludi edges ahead with an overall score of 6.9. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

IdeaBoardz
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 4.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 3.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 1.0
Enterprise-grade 1.0
Ludi
Ease of Use 9.5
Retro Toolkit 8.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 9.5
AI & Insights 4.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 5.5
Detail IdeaBoardz Ludi
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Small Small
Free tier Yes No
Free limit Fully free, no paid tier 30-day free trial; boards become read-only when the trial expires
Starting price Free $5/user/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people Custom $120/mo
Enterprise No Yes
Founded 2012 2020
HQ Pune, India UK
Features 6 33
Integrations 0 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability IdeaBoardz Ludi
Features
AI Summaries
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note

IdeaBoardz — Pros

  • + Genuinely free, no paywall, no paid tier
  • + No signup required to participate — just share a URL
  • + 1-10 customisable sections cover most retro formats (Start/Stop/Continue, 4Ls, etc.)
  • + PDF and Excel export built in
  • + Voting and async input out of the box

IdeaBoardz — Cons

  • UI is unchanged from the early 2010s and shows it
  • No timer, no facilitation phases, no drag-and-drop grouping
  • Zero integrations with the agile stack (Jira, Slack, Teams, Confluence, etc.)
  • No prebuilt templates, no health checks, no AI features
  • Boards are public-by-URL with no SSO, SOC 2, or stated privacy controls
  • Apparently in maintenance mode — Terms last updated April 2020, no changelog or blog

Ludi — Pros

  • + Genuinely delightful, illustrated UI that energises in-person and remote retros
  • + Broad template library (100+) covering retros, icebreakers, planning poker, futurespectives, planning and estimation
  • + Solid two-way Jira integration: backlog refinement, estimation and issue creation in-board
  • + Facilitator controls, private writing mode and shareable team spaces
  • + First AI feature shipped Feb 2026 — Sort into Topics auto-groups stickies into labelled topics
  • + EU-hosted (Amsterdam) on SOC 2 / ISO 27001 infrastructure; GDPR-aligned

Ludi — Cons

  • No async retro mode, no recurring or scheduled retros
  • No team health check or longitudinal pulse product; mood/radar work via whiteboard templates only
  • Integrations limited to Jira — no Slack, Teams, Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • AI limited to one clustering feature — no summaries, action-item extraction, sentiment or coaching
  • No ongoing free plan; expired trials become read-only
  • SSO gated to Enterprise tier; no SCIM, audit logs or domain restrictions advertised
← All comparisons