Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs TeleRetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

7.3

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a generous free tier and per-team paid plans.

Full review →
TeleRetro logo

TeleRetro

7.0

Fun, engaging retrospectives your team will love

TeleRetro is a remote-first retrospective tool built around team engagement — animated GIF reactions, icebreaker games, planning poker and a clean facilitation flow. It targets small to mid-size agile teams who want retros that feel lively rather than mechanical.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 7.3 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers paid plans from $29/mo.

TeleRetro scores 7.0 overall and is best for remote and hybrid agile teams who prioritise engagement and fun alongside a solid retrospective facilitation workflow. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro leads on ease of use, AI & insights and enterprise-grade. TeleRetro leads on fun factor.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, GoRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 5.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 6.5
TeleRetro
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 9.0
AI & Insights 5.0
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 5.0
Detail GoRetro TeleRetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Any Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial of all paid features, no credit card required 1 team, 3 retros, 14-day retro access, limited AI Bot access
Starting price $29/mo £26/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $29/mo £26/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020 2020
HQ Israel UK
Features 34 33
Integrations 2 3

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability GoRetro TeleRetro
Features
AI Summaries note note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights note
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU)

GoRetro — Pros

  • + Generous free tier with unlimited public boards and team members
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with strong template library
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — Cons

  • Slack integration sits behind paid tiers; SAML SSO requires Organization tier
  • Integration breadth is narrow: no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • No async mode, no whiteboard, no scheduling/recurring retros
  • Per-team pricing scales unevenly across many squads, and cross-team rollups are thin

TeleRetro — Pros

  • + Standout engagement features — animated GIF reactions and icebreaker games make retros genuinely enjoyable
  • + Clean, low-friction facilitation flow with timer, voting, grouping and action items in one place
  • + Async mode lets distributed teams contribute before the live session
  • + Action carry-over keeps previous items visible so nothing gets lost between sprints
  • + Generous free tier — unlimited retros for small teams with no credit card required

TeleRetro — Cons

  • No native health-check or longitudinal pulse module
  • AI limited to a beta board-summary feature — no grouping, action extraction or sentiment
  • Integration set is narrow — no Confluence, GitHub, Linear or Azure DevOps
  • No SCIM, audit logs or advanced enterprise controls; SSO gated to higher plans
  • No cross-team reporting or org-level dashboards
← All comparisons