Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs RetroTool

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

7.3

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a generous free tier and per-team paid plans.

Full review →
RetroTool logo

RetroTool

4.4

Anonymous online retrospectives, no login required

RetroTool is a low-friction online retrospective board built by NY/Poland software agency u2i as a side project. Free anonymous retros run from a unique URL with no signup; paid tiers add private boards, team management and longer retention. The product still works, but the site shows no shipped activity in years.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 7.3 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers paid plans from $29/mo.

RetroTool scores 4.4 overall and is best for small or ad-hoc teams who want a free, no-signup retro board with secret voting and a few standard templates — provided you're comfortable using a tool that hasn't shipped visible updates in years. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, AI & insights, integrations and enterprise-grade.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, GoRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 5.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 6.5
RetroTool
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 5.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 2.0
Enterprise-grade 2.0
Detail GoRetro RetroTool
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Any Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial of all paid features, no credit card required Anonymous boards, unlimited cards, columns, action points and participants; 12-month retention; basic facilitation
Starting price $29/mo $10/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $29/mo $10/mo
Enterprise Yes No
Founded 2020
HQ Israel Poland
Features 34 13
Integrations 2 0

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability GoRetro RetroTool
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights note
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR note
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU)

GoRetro — Pros

  • + Generous free tier with unlimited public boards and team members
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with strong template library
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — Cons

  • Slack integration sits behind paid tiers; SAML SSO requires Organization tier
  • Integration breadth is narrow: no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • No async mode, no whiteboard, no scheduling/recurring retros
  • Per-team pricing scales unevenly across many squads, and cross-team rollups are thin

RetroTool — Pros

  • + Genuinely free anonymous retros with no account required
  • + Three-click setup — unique URL, share, run
  • + Zero-knowledge encryption with custom passwords on Company plan
  • + Per-team flat pricing ($10 or $20/team/mo) rather than per-seat

RetroTool — Cons

  • <strong>Apparently dormant</strong>: no blog, changelog or release notes; legal docs last updated 2020
  • No native integrations with Jira, Slack, Teams or any agile-stack tool
  • No AI features (clustering, summary, action extraction, sentiment)
  • No health checks, recurring retros, or cross-team reporting
  • Secret voting and private boards locked behind paid tiers
  • Not SOC 2; no SSO/SCIM/audit logs for enterprise buyers
← All comparisons