Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs RetroTeam

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

7.3

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a generous free tier and per-team paid plans.

Full review →
RetroTeam logo

RetroTeam

6.6

AI retrospective tool for high-performing teams

RetroTeam is a focused, AI-first retrospective app that runs teams through a structured capture, group, vote, and action-items flow with Jira sync.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 7.3 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers paid plans from $29/mo.

RetroTeam scores 6.6 overall and is best for small to mid-size agile teams who want lightweight AI-assisted retros and Jira hand-off without enterprise overhead. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor, integrations and enterprise-grade. RetroTeam leads on value and AI & insights.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, GoRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 5.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 6.5
RetroTeam
Ease of Use 8.5
Retro Toolkit 6.5
Value 8.5
Fun Factor 6.5
AI & Insights 8.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail GoRetro RetroTeam
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Any Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial of all paid features, no credit card required 1 team, 10 users, 10 boards, 10 AI credits
Starting price $29/mo $10/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $29/mo $10/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020 2022
HQ Israel
Features 34 16
Integrations 2 1

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability GoRetro RetroTeam
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights note
Polling note
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence
GitHub
Jira
Linear
Microsoft Teams
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU)

GoRetro — Pros

  • + Generous free tier with unlimited public boards and team members
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with strong template library
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — Cons

  • Slack integration sits behind paid tiers; SAML SSO requires Organization tier
  • Integration breadth is narrow: no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • No async mode, no whiteboard, no scheduling/recurring retros
  • Per-team pricing scales unevenly across many squads, and cross-team rollups are thin

RetroTeam — Pros

  • + Strong AI grouping and action-item generation
  • + Flat per-team pricing scales well for small squads
  • + Tight, opinionated retro flow (capture, group, vote, act)
  • + Direct Jira sync for action items
  • + Active product — weekly blog cadence through March 2026

RetroTeam — Cons

  • Integration set is Jira-only; Slack, Teams, GitHub, Linear, Azure DevOps not advertised
  • No health checks, kudos, or longitudinal team-pulse tracking
  • Light on enterprise controls (SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, audit logs not mentioned publicly)
  • AI is credit-gated — Premium ships 50 credits/mo, Pro 150; heavy use forces an upgrade
  • Only 4 built-in templates and no custom-template builder advertised
← All comparisons