Retrospective Tools

GoRetro vs Reetro

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

GoRetro logo

GoRetro

7.3

Make every sprint impactful, efficient, and fun

GoRetro is a sprint-centric retro and estimation suite combining retrospectives, planning poker, capacity planning and a Jira-fed sprint monitor, with a generous free tier and per-team paid plans.

Full review →
Reetro logo

Reetro

7.1

Fun, easy and AI-powered online retrospectives

Reetro is a lightweight retrospective tool with a generous free tier and an AI-powered Pro tier covering meeting summaries, sentiment analysis, monthly reports, customizable health checks and an action tracker, backed by ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 alignment.

Full review →

Summary

GoRetro scores 7.3 overall and is best for scrum teams that live in Jira and want a polished retro plus planning-poker bundle priced per team. It offers paid plans from $29/mo.

Reetro scores 7.1 overall and is best for small to mid-sized agile teams who want a low-cost, easy retro board with AI summaries, customizable health checks and Jira/Azure DevOps export. It offers a free tier.

GoRetro leads on ease of use, retro toolkit, fun factor and enterprise-grade. Reetro leads on AI & insights and integrations.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, GoRetro edges ahead with an overall score of 7.3. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

GoRetro
Ease of Use 9.0
Retro Toolkit 7.5
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 8.5
AI & Insights 5.5
Integrations 6.0
Enterprise-grade 6.5
Reetro
Ease of Use 8.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 8.0
Fun Factor 7.0
AI & Insights 7.0
Integrations 7.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Detail GoRetro Reetro
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Any Small
Free tier No Yes
Free limit 30-day free trial of all paid features, no credit card required 3 teams, 9 members per team, 10 active boards/month, 4 columns, 1 health check/month
Starting price $29/mo $29/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people $29/mo $29/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2020 2019
HQ Israel Copenhagen, Denmark
Features 34 40
Integrations 2 6

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability GoRetro Reetro
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering
AI action items
Action tracking
Team Insights note
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates note
Anonymous input note
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations note
Health Checks note
Team Kudos note
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps note
Confluence note
GitHub
Jira note
Linear
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note note
Trello note
Security & Privacy
SOC 2 note
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note note
ISO 27001
On-premises note
Data residency (US/EU)

GoRetro — Pros

  • + Generous free tier with unlimited public boards and team members
  • + Polished, real-time facilitation UX with strong template library
  • + Bundles planning poker, capacity calculator and sprint monitor with retros
  • + Tight Jira Cloud integration for sprint-data-driven discussions
  • + SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and SAML SSO available on Organization tier

GoRetro — Cons

  • Slack integration sits behind paid tiers; SAML SSO requires Organization tier
  • Integration breadth is narrow: no native MS Teams, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Linear, Confluence or Trello
  • AI story is thin: 'Joker cards' and meeting recap export rather than real AI clustering, summaries or sentiment
  • No async mode, no whiteboard, no scheduling/recurring retros
  • Per-team pricing scales unevenly across many squads, and cross-team rollups are thin

Reetro — Pros

  • + Generous free tier with no credit card required
  • + Per-team Pro pricing ($29/team/mo) keeps costs predictable for small squads
  • + AI summaries, sentiment analysis and monthly reports included on paid
  • + Customizable team health checks, polls and a happiness index
  • + ISO 27001 certified with SOC 2 alignment and audit logs

Reetro — Cons

  • Free plan capped at 3 teams, 9 members, 10 boards/month and 4 columns, with anonymity now paid-only
  • Voting is essentially upvote/downvote — no vote-on-ideas-in-groups
  • Reporting & analytics screens (team reporting, comparative reporting, monthly reporting, PDF export) still listed as <em>coming soon</em>
  • Several quality-of-life features flagged 'coming soon' — link cards, @mentions, scheduler, icebreakers, on-premises, in-app notifications
  • No public changelog or release notes — hard to verify what's shipped recently from the outside
  • No planning poker, whiteboard, presentation mode, mobile app, or GitHub/Linear integrations
← All comparisons