Retrospective Tools

Echometer vs Trune.io

A side-by-side look at scores, pricing, features and integrations to help you pick the right retrospective tool.

Echometer logo

Echometer

6.0

Psychology-backed retros and team health checks for engineering teams

Echometer is a German retrospective and 1:1 meeting platform built around recurring health-check pulses, structured retros, and longitudinal team development tracking. It pitches itself to engineering managers, scrum masters and agile coaches who want <strong>research-grounded surveys</strong> rather than a blank whiteboard.

Full review →
Trune.io logo

Trune.io

5.0

Structured online retrospectives with team radar

Trune (formerly Fraankly) is an EU-built retrospective and team-feedback tool with pre-built and custom templates, anonymous voting, action tracking, and an Agility Health Radar for trending team health over time. Hosted in Frankfurt with a strong GDPR posture.

Full review →

Summary

Echometer scores 6.0 overall and is best for engineering managers and agile coaches who want recurring health-check pulses tied to retros, with EU data residency and a research-flavoured question library. It offers a free tier.

Trune.io scores 5.0 overall and is best for small EU-based agile teams that want a simple, <strong>GDPR-aligned</strong> retro tool with templates, voting, and a lightweight team radar — and don't need SSO, AI, or cross-team rollups. It offers a free tier.

Echometer leads on retro toolkit, AI & insights and enterprise-grade. Trune.io leads on integrations.

Across our seven scoring dimensions, Echometer edges ahead with an overall score of 6.0. That said, the right pick depends on your team — see the dimension-by-dimension breakdown below.

Scores compared

Echometer
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 7.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 6.0
Integrations 4.0
Enterprise-grade 6.0
Trune.io
Ease of Use 7.0
Retro Toolkit 6.0
Value 7.0
Fun Factor 5.0
AI & Insights 1.0
Integrations 5.0
Enterprise-grade 4.0
Detail Echometer Trune.io
Category Retrospectives Retrospectives
Team size Mid-market Small
Free tier Yes Yes
Free limit Starter: 1 team, 25 workspace members, 1 retro/month after trial 5 free sessions, full Premium features, no credit card
Starting price €35/mo $19/mo
Est. 3 teams × 8 people €35/mo $19/mo
Enterprise Yes Yes
Founded 2019
HQ Münster, Germany Vienna, Austria
Features 46 18
Integrations 1 8

Feature & integration comparison

Side-by-side checklist across features, integrations and security. Hover a note for details.

Capability Echometer Trune.io
Features
AI Summaries note
AI grouping/clustering note
AI action items note
Action tracking
Team Insights
Polling
Action dashboard
Custom templates
Anonymous input
Independent voting
Async mode
Agile Estimations
Health Checks note
Team Kudos
Whiteboard
Integrations
Asana
Azure DevOps
Confluence note
GitHub note
Jira
Linear note
Microsoft Teams note
Slack note
Trello
Security & Privacy
SOC 2
GDPR
SSO/SAML/SCIM note
ISO 27001
On-premises
Data residency (US/EU) note note

Echometer — Pros

  • + Health-check question library grounded in University of Münster psychology research
  • + Strong longitudinal pulse and team-radar reporting tied to retros
  • + EU-only data residency (Open Telekom Cloud, Germany) with GDPR DPA
  • + AI Co-Pilot clusters ideas and proposes SMART action items

Echometer — Cons

  • Thin chatops integrations — no native Slack, Teams or Confluence
  • No SOC 2; relies on ISO 27001 datacenters and EU residency
  • 1:1 meetings and the deepest AI live in a separate paid product
  • No native scheduling or recurring retros — sessions start manually

Trune.io — Pros

  • + EU/Frankfurt data residency and GDPR-first posture
  • + Free tier covers 5 full-featured sessions, no card required
  • + Per-team (not per-seat) pricing keeps costs predictable
  • + Agility Health Radar gives a basic longitudinal view
  • + Native iOS/Android apps for hybrid retros

Trune.io — Cons

  • No SSO, SCIM, SOC 2, or audit logs — not enterprise-ready
  • No AI features (clustering, summaries, action extraction, sentiment)
  • Direct chat integrations (Slack, Teams) only via Zapier
  • Light on facilitation extras: no parking lot, agenda planner, async mode, or drag-and-drop grouping
  • Reporting is limited to per-team stats; no cross-team or org rollups
← All comparisons